Reference 18

Level I Good quality evidence Systematic review of RCTs with
consistent findings
High quality individual RCT
Level II Limited quality patient
orientated evidence
Systematic review of lower quality
studies or studies with inconsistent
findings
Low quality clinical trial
Cohort studies
Case-control studies
Level III Other Consensus guidelines, extrapolations
from bench research, usual practice,
opinion, disease-oriented evidence
(intermediate or physiologic outcomes
only), or case series

[18] Vaccines – splenectomy: Davies JM, Lewis MP, Wimperis J, Rafi I, Ladhani S, Bolton-Maggs PH; British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Review of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of infection in patients with an absent or dysfunctional spleen: prepared on behalf of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology by a working party of the Haemato-Oncology task force. Br J Haematol. 2011 Nov;155(3):308-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21988145

Vaccines – splenectomy: Rubin LG, Levin MJ, Ljungman P, Davies EG, Avery R, Tomblyn M, Bousvaros A, Dhanireddy S, Sung L, Keyserling H, Kang I, Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2013 IDSA clinical practice guideline for vaccination of the immunocompromised host. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Feb;58(3):e44-100. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24311479

Vaccines – splenectomy: Davidson RN, Wall RA. Prevention and management of infections in patients

without a spleen. ClinMicrobiol Infect. 2001 Dec;7(12):657-60. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11843905

Vaccines – splenectomy:Bisharat N, Omari H, Lavi I, Raz R. Risk of infection and death among

post-splenectomy patients. J Infect. 2001 Oct;43(3):182-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11798256