| Level I | Good quality evidence |
Systematic review of RCTs with consistent findings High quality individual RCT |
| Level II |
Limited quality patient orientated evidence |
Systematic review of lower quality studies or studies with inconsistent findings Low quality clinical trial Cohort studies Case-control studies |
| Level III | Other |
Consensus guidelines, extrapolations from bench research, usual practice, opinion, disease-oriented evidence (intermediate or physiologic outcomes only), or case series |
[14] Fluconazole, oral:Gupta AK, Ryder JE, Johnson AM. Cumulative meta-analysis of systemic antifungal agents for the treatment of onychomycosis.Br J Dermatol. 2004 Mar;150(3):537-44. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15030339
Fluconazole:Nozickova M, Koudelkova V, Kulikova Z, Malina L, Urbanowski S, Silny W. Acomparison of the efficacy of oral fluconazole, 150 mg/week versus 50 mg/day, in the treatment of tinea corporis, tinea cruris, tinea pedis, and cutaneous candidosis.Int J Dermatol. 1998 Sep;37(9):703-5.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9762826
Fluconazole: Faergemann J, Mörk NJ, Haglund A, Odegård T. A multicentre (double-blind) comparative study to assess the safety and efficacy of fluconazole andgriseofulvin in the treatment of tinea corporis and tinea cruris. Br J Dermatol.1997 Apr;136(4):575-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/91559